PlanetSquires Forums

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
 on: April 24, 2019, 04:58:43 PM 
Started by Patrick Beyltjens - Last post by Patrick Beyltjens

Iam new in Free Basic.

I use WinFBE and visual designer to learn the first steps.
It works very smoothly.

I have 2 questions for the moment :

1) How can i use a timer in the visual designer code. I like too update the  time in a text controll every second or so.

2) How can i use a tooltip on a button.

Can someone give me an example

Thanks in advance

 on: April 24, 2019, 11:08:59 AM 
Started by Petrus Vorster - Last post by Joerg Buckel
Hi raymw
Then I guess I misunderstood you. Excuse me.

I wrote my first program with GW Basic.There weren't that many commands, but it was enough for my needs.
Then came Quickbasic, Turbobasic, Powerbasic, Visualbasic, and so on.
With all the possibilities. And with all the possibilities the demands have also increased. And with the demands the confusion.
Many of my acquaintances think I should use .Net. Everything quite simply.
And now we are perhaps with what you meant.
I have looked at .Net. maybe thousends of Functions.  I needed more time to find the functions than to program them.
Sure it goes faster if I know what I need and know where I find it.
Perhaps also only one thing of the attitude. Also the own.
But I simply did not like it.
I like it when I don't have to deliver a 100 MB framework because I don't know if they are available on the computer.
I like small programs that I can pass on and know it works.
That's why I also appreciated Powerbasic very much.
But that is unfortunately past.
And now I am learning something new again and am glad that I have a helper with WinFBE.

 on: April 24, 2019, 09:03:36 AM 
Started by Petrus Vorster - Last post by Petrus Vorster
Hi All

Yes i think i understand what everyone is saying.
The more eye candy, the lesser the performance. Like .NET. What a piece of bulky garbage!
Looks great, but you need a super computer to run the darn thing properly.

I love Basic. So simple (well for me at least) and Paul makes life a breeze.
Without Paul, JosŤ and Firefly, i probably would have left Hobbyist programming a long time ago.

So what i want to do is somewhere in the middle, not overbearing looks but a couple of small touches that will please my mind.
I am basically a drag and drop programmer, it works for me and I enjoy the help the tools provide at work.
(And enjoy also to see how politically promoted idiots struggle without the tools they cant create and their own red tape prevents them from buying. It gives me great joy to say the least.)

This WinFBE is like watching someone build you a new car, you know it's going to be great, but you keep on annoying the maker with all kinds of new ideas.. LOL.

This is by far the most joyful forum with some of the most helpful people in the world that i had ever came across.

Great stuff everyone, and thanks for always being supportive.


 on: April 24, 2019, 07:53:46 AM 
Started by Petrus Vorster - Last post by raymw
Hi Joerg,
Only I understand what I'm trying to say?
I am very disappointed in the lack of real progress in software.
I'm not referring to Paul's and Jose's exceedingly useful efforts, but more general software development, the way in which things are made unnecessarily more complex, for example. Probably because the people involved are a few stages removed from the end user, and the commercial requirements over-ride the functionality. I could give thousands of examples, but you probably know many yourself. (Try using the help for Visual Studio (C#) - You'll maybe know what I'm driving at - it was rubbish a few years ago, no idea about it now)

 on: April 24, 2019, 05:48:28 AM 
Started by Petrus Vorster - Last post by Joerg Buckel
Hello raymw
Here the opinions will probably be different.
Like many other hobby programmers, I belong to the faction who are happy about every relief.

Of course I know that every relief promotes a mental laziness.
But I accept that. I'm just glad that Paul is doing this work and that Jose doesn't have long time needs for change requests or adjustments.
So far I don't have the impression at all that WinFBE is overloaded. But I don't worry that it will be like this one day.
Why are you very disappointed about the lack of real progress in the software?I find your statement a little unfair.
Keep in mind that only Paul is working on it as an individual.

And he can only work on it "on the side".He also has to earn a living.

It ist a great work.
And we have the time to wait, until this work is ready.Or you have to use a rudimentary development.

 on: April 24, 2019, 04:55:53 AM 
Started by Petrus Vorster - Last post by Jean-pierre Leroy
Even greater if it could run on Android too....  ;)...a need I had run into multiple times now. To apply a Android portion to work with my PC tool.
Hi Petrus,

If you're looking for a simple and robust tool to develop applications on Android, I can suggest B4A.
B4A programming language is like Basic.
More info here


 on: April 24, 2019, 12:48:59 AM 
Started by Petrus Vorster - Last post by SeaVipe
Paul, you're a Wizard! Thanks so much for all the hard work you're putting into this very substantial product - looking forward to the next release.

Jose, Great stuff, I always enjoy and appreciate your no-nonsense replies which make it so much easier to solve my own programming issues.
And thanks to all you other good folks and good programmers who are contributing - your code snippets, ideas and comments are a real help.

 on: April 23, 2019, 10:34:39 PM 
Started by Petrus Vorster - Last post by Paul Squires
My goal is get the basics of the visual designer working perfectly before adding any eye candy. I have modified the ListBox control to make it better looking with hot mouse tracking and coloring. I have also modified the Label control to allow more functionality than the standard Windows control. Likewise, we're using Jose's CXPButton to replace the standard Windows command button control. The big things missing right now are Treeview, Listview and tab control, however I feel confident that these will be added much more easily now that the guts of the program is pretty solid. I just finished writing a program to use at work and it allowed me to test every aspect of the underlying framework. The number of changes that I made were so much that I stopped documenting them all.

 on: April 23, 2019, 06:27:53 PM 
Started by Petrus Vorster - Last post by raymw
Well, I prefer functionality over form. Need a simple reliable tool, not a load of gee-whiz arty farty garbage. The picture that you, Peter, paint of 'management' makes me so happy I left behind such creatures over 20 years or so ago - lucky me... My philosophy? is keep it simple. Keep it crisp. I am very disappointed in the lack of real progress in software. I like the relative simplicity of the basic basic language, not so happy with the bells and whisles being added to make it into something else. I would hope that if the fancy options are desired, that they don't clutter the interface. I would prefer a stripped down default list of choices, and then, once it is proven to function, add in the pretty layers afterwards. Just because a thing is possible, it is not necessary that it should be achieved. (Reminds me of an old TV remote that had 64 buttons on it, just 'cos they could. A bit of a problem locating the three or four you needed amidst the forest of the other sixty or so.

 on: April 23, 2019, 01:48:59 PM 
Started by Petrus Vorster - Last post by Petrus Vorster
I have done a great deal of research on aesthetics in software.
The Baby boomers generation started this whole computer use thing but the millennials are now on the roll.
The millennials literally were born with an app in hand, so to speak and not only values ease of performance but also the aesthetics of what they are using or buying.
I suppose it's like a car. A VW Beetle will get you anywhere reliably, but you will probably purchase a Mercedes or a Jeep with all the bells and whistles.
Most heavyweight production tools like C# and Android tools comes with a plethora of gimmicks, and the users love it.
Stupid as it may seem to choose between different coloured smiley faces or ten different styles of poo icons, the fact remains the users love this.

Although i am a hobbyist with way too little time to sit and try and program something for work, i have discovered that this counts just as much with senior people as with junior millennial users.
I saw with my own eyes how an It manager passed the biggest piece of cr@p software past a visiting cabinet minister by looks alone. The Minister even said "Gentleman I am impressed!" without knowing he had been shown a bunch of Icons running from a local database and that the platform online had not even been developed yet....(and its still a disaster today...)

You are making wonderful progress here, and i am childishly excited about the bucket loads of work you are all putting into this.
It would be an absolute heaven sent gift if the visual designer could allow additional controls, smart controls, plug ins etc.
Even greater if it could run on Android too....  ;)...a need I had run into multiple times now. To apply a Android portion to work with my PC tool.
Any hobbyists work i do will have a much better chance of being permitted to cover the gaps op our organisation's ancient software.

Whatever you roll out here is great stuff, I am very thankful for what is happening.

Keep up the good work.


Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10