inconsistency between control function naming

[Jonathan Bristow]

ff_listbox_resetcontent
ff_combobox_resetcontent
ff_listview_deleteallitems
ff_treeview_deleteallitems

Surely all 4 perform the same action within each control, so why the different names?

[TechSupport]

They are named differently because they kind of mirror the underlying Win32 API calls that are made. Listbox/Combobox call %LB_RESETCONTENT and %CB_RESETCONTENT, and ListView calls %LVM_DELETEALLITEMS and TreeView %TVM_DELETEITEM (%TVI_ROOT).

Looking back on it, when I first wrote the wrappers it probably would have made more sense to use a common naming convention for all the controls (standard and common controls).

[Roger Garstang]

I don't see anything wrong with the different names.  The only enhancements I see is the InsertItem and SetItem for Listviews, etc.  In the Insert Item it automatically uses SetItem internally if not the 0 column, so why not combine them into one, and only have one function?  Perhaps making the other call the new version for backwards compat.